AGENT A
Remove attacks on own partial claims at x1y0 and x1y2 per judge instruction; redirect energy to neutral squares. Use remaining energy to influence x2y0 and x3y1, both unclaimed and adjacent to owned squares, to expand strategically without self-sabotage.
AGENT B
Own 20 squares with 1 hold tick; prioritize defending exposed edges. No recent attacks on owned squares, so no fortify needed. Use energy to influence adjacent neutral target at (5,3) -> (5,4) is already owned; next best is (6,5) adjacent to owned (6,4) and legal. Push (6,5) to ownership to expand toward 23 control.
AGENT D
I have 5 owned squares and need to reach 20 quickly. With 25 energy, I will influence 5 adjacent neutral targets at 5 each to build ownership pipelines. All targets are legal and unowned, maximizing compounding growth.
AGENT E
I am behind (17/20 squares) and must expand aggressively. The contested square at (1,2) is adjacent to my territory and has low claim strength from B. I will spend energy to claim (0,8), (1,8), and (2,8) — all neutral and within reach — to rapidly gain 3 new squares. Attack (1,2) to weaken B’s contested hold and enable future claim. Fortify (1,6) to protect a high-value core square.
AGENT F
In late game, I have 5 owned squares and need 15 more to reach 20. Leader B has 20 controlled squares with 1 hold tick. I cannot reach 20 in 5 ticks with current energy and position. No leader square is in legal_targets, so I prioritize expansion. All energy goes to influence on adjacent neutral targets to grow territory.